If you’ve ever searched for Garth Brooks on Spotify or Apple Music, you’ve probably noticed his music is nowhere to be found. This isn’t some oversight—Garth Brooks, one of the most successful solo artists in U.S. history, has intentionally kept his music off most major streaming platforms. His decision is rooted in artist control, fair compensation, and a strategic partnership with Amazon Music.
Garth Brooks’ Exclusive Deal with Amazon Music Explained
In 2016, Garth Brooks made headlines when he signed an exclusive deal with Amazon Music, making it the only major streaming platform to carry his catalog. According to Billboard, Brooks was drawn to Amazon’s flexibility, allowing him to incorporate streaming and physical album sales. This partnership gave him the control he desired, allowing him to protect his music while still dipping into the digital world.
Unlike platforms like Spotify, which focus solely on streaming, Amazon offered a hybrid approach. This deal allowed Brooks to preserve the traditional album experience, which mattered deeply to him and his fans.
Why Garth Brooks Rejects Spotify and Apple Music
One key reason Brooks has avoided platforms like Spotify and Apple Music is his firm stance on artist compensation. Uproxx reported that Brooks has long advocated for fair royalties, especially for songwriters. He has consistently voiced concerns about how other platforms handle payouts and has been unwilling to compromise on his principles for streaming.
Brooks made it clear that Apple’s model, in particular, didn’t align with his values. “They came in with their own set of rules… I’m never going to change to fit their rules,” Brooks told Uproxx. His decision to stick with Amazon allowed him to balance streaming with physical sales, which he felt ensured fair pay for everyone involved in creating his music.
Garth Brooks’ Fight for Fair Compensation in Streaming
RELATED: 10 Surprising Facts You Didn’t Know About Garth Brooks
One of the core motivations behind Garth Brooks’ decision is his strong advocacy for fair compensation, especially for songwriters. Platforms like Spotify and Apple Music have long been criticized for their royalty structures, which many argue don’t fairly compensate the creators behind the music. As a songwriter, Brooks stands firm in ensuring that the people who create the music are adequately rewarded. His partnership with Amazon Music was partly driven by this desire to uphold those values.
How Garth Brooks’ Decision Affects His Fans
Brooks’ commitment to maintaining control over his music is admirable. Still, it has created some distance between him and potential listeners. According to Billboard, fans who primarily use platforms like Spotify and Apple Music are left without easy access to Brooks’ catalog. In a world where streaming is the primary way music is consumed, this could affect his ability to reach new, younger audiences who might not seek out his music on Amazon.
For hardcore fans, Brooks’ exclusive deal with Amazon may not be a dealbreaker—they’ll follow him wherever his music is. But for casual listeners, especially those who’ve grown up in the streaming era, the extra effort required to find his music might be a barrier.
The Long-Term Impact of Garth Brooks’ Streaming Choices
RELATED: Garth Brooks and Trisha Yearwood: A Timeless Love Story
Brooks’ absence on major streaming platforms raises questions about his long-term legacy. As streaming continues to dominate the music industry, artists who aren’t widely available risk losing exposure to future generations. Variety noted that while Brooks has built an unmatched career, limiting his music to one platform could hinder his reach to younger listeners who rely solely on streaming for music discovery.
Brooks has always been an artist who plays by his own rules. Still, this decision could make it challenging to keep his music relevant in the digital age.
Garth Brooks’ Calculated Move
Garth Brooks’ decision to keep his music off most streaming platforms is about more than just control—it’s about standing up for what he believes in. His Amazon deal allowed him to maintain creative freedom while ensuring fair compensation for songwriters and artists. However, this choice also means some fans are left without easy access to his music, potentially limiting his reach to new listeners.
Whether this approach will pay off in the long run remains to be seen. For now, Brooks is sticking to his principles, and as always, he’s doing it his way.